Hi, Last August, Dinis Cruz wrote a blog entry [1] detailing a CSRF attack on a Neo4J Server resulting in an RCE. The server's documentation [2] mentions the following. "By default, the Neo4j Server comes with some places where arbitrary code code execution can happen. These are the Section 19.15, “Traversals” REST endpoints. To secure these, either disable them completely by removing offending plugins from the server class-path, or secure access to these URLs through proxies or Authorization Rules." This could mean that the RCE itself is not CVE worthy as it is a documented/expected behavior. However, should the CSRF flaw be considered a vulnerability and assigned a CVE? Regards, Arun [1] http://blog.diniscruz.com/2013/08/neo4j-csrf-payload-to-start-processes.html [2] http://docs.neo4j.org/chunked/stable/security-server.html#_arbitrary_code_execution -- Arun Neelicattu / Red Hat Security Response Team PGP: 0xC244393B 5229 F596 474F 00A1 E416 CF8B 36F5 5054 C244 393B