Podatność CVE-2016-2183


Publikacja: 2016-08-31   Modyfikacja: 2016-09-01

Opis:
The DES and Triple DES ciphers, as used in the TLS, SSH, and IPSec protocols and other protocols and products, have a birthday bound of approximately four billion blocks, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain cleartext data via a birthday attack against a long-duration encrypted session, as demonstrated by an HTTPS session using Triple DES in CBC mode, aka a "Sweet32" attack.

W naszej bazie, znaleźliśmy następujące noty dla tego CVE:
Tytuł
Autor
Data
High
IBM Informix Dynamic Server DLL Injection / Code Execution
Informix
01.06.2017

Typ:

CWE-200

(Information Exposure)

CVSS2 => (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N)

Ogólna skala CVSS
Znaczenie
Łatwość wykorzystania
5/10
2.9/10
10/10
Wymagany dostęp
Złożoność ataku
Autoryzacja
Zdalny
Niska
Nie wymagana
Wpływ na poufność
Wpływ na integralność
Wpływ na dostępność
Częściowy
Brak
Brak
Affected software
Redhat -> Jboss enterprise application platform 
Redhat -> Jboss enterprise web server 
Redhat -> Jboss web server 
Redhat -> Enterprise linux 
Python -> Python 
Oracle -> Database 
Openssl -> Openssl 
Cisco -> Content security management appliance 

 Referencje:
http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10759
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-10/msg00013.html
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0336.html
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0337.html
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0338.html
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0462.html
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=nas8N1021697
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21991482
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21995039
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuapr2018-3678067.html
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan2018-3236628.html
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2017-3236622.html
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2016-2881722.html
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2017-3236626.html
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinoct2016-3090545.html
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/ovmbulletinoct2016-3090547.html
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92630
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/95568
http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1036696
http://www.splunk.com/view/SP-CAAAPSV
http://www.splunk.com/view/SP-CAAAPUE
https://access.redhat.com/articles/2548661
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1216
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2708
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2709
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2710
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3113
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3114
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3239
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3240
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2123
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1245
https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2016-2183
https://blog.cryptographyengineering.com/2016/08/24/attack-of-week-64-bit-ciphers-in-tls/
https://bto.bluecoat.com/security-advisory/sa133
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369383
https://github.com/ssllabs/ssllabs-scan/issues/387#issuecomment-242514633
https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docLocale=en_US&docId=emr_na-hpesbgn03765en_us
https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docLocale=en_US&docId=emr_na-hpesbux03725en_us
https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05302448
https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05309984
https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05323116
https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05349499
https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05356388
https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05369403
https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05369415
https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05385680
https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05390722
https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05390849
https://ics-cert.us-cert.gov/advisories/ICSMA-18-058-02
https://kb.pulsesecure.net/articles/Pulse_Security_Advisories/SA40312
https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10171
https://nakedsecurity.sophos.com/2016/08/25/anatomy-of-a-cryptographic-collision-the-sweet32-attack/
https://nodejs.org/en/blog/vulnerability/september-2016-security-releases/
https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201612-16
https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201701-65
https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201707-01
https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20160915-0001/
https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20170119-0001/
https://sweet32.info/
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg04560.html
https://www.mitel.com/en-ca/support/security-advisories/mitel-product-security-advisory-17-0008
https://www.nccgroup.trust/us/about-us/newsroom-and-events/blog/2016/august/new-practical-attacks-on-64-bit-block-ciphers-3des-blowfish/
https://www.openssl.org/blog/blog/2016/08/24/sweet32/
https://www.sigsac.org/ccs/CCS2016/accepted-papers/
https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2016-16
https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2016-20
https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2016-21
https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2017-09
https://www.teskalabs.com/blog/teskalabs-bulletin-160826-seacat-sweet32-issue

Copyright 2024, cxsecurity.com

 

Back to Top