Home
Bugtraq
Full List
Only Bugs
Only Tricks
Only Exploits
Only Dorks
Only CVE
Only CWE
Fake Notes
Ranking
CVEMAP
Full List
Show Vendors
Show Products
CWE Dictionary
Check CVE Id
Check CWE Id
Search
Bugtraq
CVEMAP
By author
CVE Id
CWE Id
By vendors
By products
RSS
Bugtraq
CVEMAP
CVE Products
Bugs
Exploits
Dorks
More
cIFrex
Facebook
Twitter
Donate
About
Submit
Vulnerabilities for
'FENG'
2008-01-03
CVE-2007-6630
CWE-Other
The Url_init function in utils/url.c in Netembryo 0.0.4, when used by LScube Feng, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL dereference and daemon crash) via a malformed URI containing a "/:" sequence, as demonstrated by a "DESCRIBE /: RTSP/1.0" request.
CVE-2007-6629
CWE-Other
Interpretation conflict in LScube Feng 0.1.15 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL dereference and daemon crash) via a User-Agent header line that contains a carriage-return character, which is considered a line delimiter when the header is split into individual lines, but not when log_user_agent in RTSP_utils.c parses the content of the User-Agent line.
CVE-2007-6628
CWE-Other
LScube Feng 0.1.15 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL dereference and daemon crash) via (1) a malformed Transport header, which triggers misparsing in parse_transport_header in RTSP_setup.c, as demonstrated by a Transport header that contains only a "RTP/AVP;unicast;client_port" sequence; or (2) a malformed Range header, which triggers misparsing in parse_play_time_range in RTSP_Play, as demonstrated by an empty Range header.
CVE-2007-6627
CWE-189
Integer overflow in the RTSP_remove_msg function in RTSP_lowlevel.c in LScube Feng 0.1.15 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via an RTP packet with a size value of 0xffff.
CVE-2007-6626
CWE-119
Multiple buffer overflows in the RTSP_valid_response_msg function in RTSP_state_machine.c in LScube Feng 0.1.15 and earlier allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a long first line of a response, as demonstrated by a long VER line; or (2) a long second line of a response, as demonstrated by a message that follows a RETURN line.
Copyright
2024
, cxsecurity.com
Back to Top