> So it could be remotely > exploitable after all. > > On the other hand, most people don't tell their browsers to open up a > separate application to handle ftp:// links. I agree. It could be exploited in the aforementioned way(but: WS_FTP is not registered to handle FTP protocol by default). Now I am thinking of something else. Could we use a specially crafted FHF file to exploit the vulnerability? I haven't checked that yet. Michal Bucko (sapheal)