Invalid #PF Exception Code in VMware can result in Guest Privilege Escalation

2009.11.04
Risk: Medium
Local: Yes
Remote: No
CWE: CWE-Other


Ogólna skala CVSS: 6.9/10
Znaczenie: 10/10
Łatwość wykorzystania: 3.4/10
Wymagany dostęp: Lokalny
Złożoność ataku: Średnia
Autoryzacja: Nie wymagana
Wpływ na poufność: Pełny
Wpływ na integralność: Pełny
Wpływ na dostępność: Pełny

Invalid #PF Exception Code in VMware can result in Guest Privilege Escalation ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----- In protected mode, cpl is usually equal to the two least significant bits of the cs register. However, there is an exception: in Virtual-8086 mode, the cpl is always 3 (least privileged), regardless of the value of the cs register. When the processor raises a #PF (page fault) exception, an exception code is pushed onto the stack containing flags used by the operating system to determine the correct course of action. One of those flags is called U/S (user/supervisor), which is set if the fault was caused while the processor was in user mode. In Virtual-8086 mode, when VMware emulates a far call or far jmp instruction, it incorrectly pushes the return cs and ip on the stack using supervisory access, causing an incorrect exception code to be delivered to the guest kernel. As Virtual-8086 mode allows userland code to specify an arbitrary cs register, including the two least significant bits, an attacker can use this supervisory access to confuse the kernel, allowing escalation of privileges. The Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures project (cve.mitre.org) has assigned the name CVE-2009-2267 to this issue. -------------------- Affected Software ------------------------ - VMware Workstation - VMware Player - VMware ACE - VMware Server - VMware ESX - VMware Fusion - Etc. -------------------- Consequences ----------------------- We have successfully exploited this issue on Linux guests. Other guest operating systems may also be exploitable. Here is what happens on an up-to-date Ubuntu Linux 8.04 guest when the kernel handles the #PF exception with a spoofed supervisor bit in the exception code. (gdb) x/i $pc 0x900: call 0xaabb:0xccdd (gdb) si 0xc031d000 in page_fault () (gdb) x/x $esp 0xdde15f08: 0x00000002 (gdb) x/t $esp 0xdde15f08: 00000000000000000000000000000010 Examining the condition code (error_code in the snippet below), you can see it was caused by a data write (i.e. not an instruction fetch, the cs/eip push) in supervisor mode to a non-present page. This is incorrect. http://lxr.linux.no/linux+v2.6.24/arch/x86/mm/fault_32.c#L461 461 /* User mode accesses just cause a SIGSEGV */ 462 if (error_code & 4) { ... 507no_context: 508 /* Are we prepared to handle this kernel fault? */ 509 if (fixup_exception(regs)) 510 return; With a spoofed cs register, this can lead to this path (see the SEGMENT_IS_PNP_CODE macro from segment_32.h), causing the kernel to reach the pnp_bios_is_utter_crap code, and attempting this recovery: http://lxr.linux.no/linux+v2.6.24/arch/x86/mm/extable_32.c#L20 19 printk(KERN_CRIT "PNPBIOS fault.. attempting recovery.\n"); 20 __asm__ volatile( 21 "movl %0, %%esp\n\t" 22 "jmp *%1\n\t" 23 : : "g" (pnp_bios_fault_esp), "g" (pnp_bios_fault_eip)); 24 panic("do_trap: can't hit this"); 25 } pnp_bios_fault_eip and pnp_bios_fault_esp are both .bss objects, and will be initialised to NULL. Thus, line 22 will transfer execution to the first page. Therefore, incorrectly reporting the supervisor bit can lead to a local ring3->ring0 privilege escalation in guests. /* ... */ // Setup registers vm.regs.eflags = EFLAGS_TF_MASK; vm.regs.esp = 0xDEADBEEF; vm.regs.eip = 0x00000000; vm.regs.cs = 0x0090; vm.regs.ss = 0xFFFF; CODE16("call 0xaabb:0xccdd", code, codesize); vm86(Vm86Enter, &vm); /* ... */ The attached non-weaponised proof of concept demonstrates this by printing a message to the console from ring0. ------------------- Solution ----------------------- Updated software is available from the vendor at http://www.vmware.com/ http://www.vmware.com/security/advisories/VMSA-2009-0015.html ------------------- Credit ----------------------- This bug was discovered by Tavis Ormandy and Julien Tinnes of the Google Security Team. ------------------- Greetz ----------------------- Greetz to Lcamtuf, LiquidK, redpig, Neel, pipacs, spoonm, asiraP, Jagger, and our other elite colleagues. Additional greetz to everyone at $1$K2XTi4ZA$H5Y197fbrMk85ZWzNw/Nm0. Enjoy some photography while at ring0 @ http://flickr.com/meder

Referencje:

http://www.vmware.com/security/advisories/VMSA-2009-0015.html
http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/3062
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/36841
http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/archive/1/507539/100/0/threaded
http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/archive/1/507523/100/0/threaded
http://securitytracker.com/id?1023083
http://securitytracker.com/id?1023082
http://secunia.com/advisories/37172
http://lists.vmware.com/pipermail/security-announce/2009/000069.html


Vote for this issue:
50%
50%


 

Thanks for you vote!


 

Thanks for you comment!
Your message is in quarantine 48 hours.

Comment it here.


(*) - required fields.  
{{ x.nick }} | Date: {{ x.ux * 1000 | date:'yyyy-MM-dd' }} {{ x.ux * 1000 | date:'HH:mm' }} CET+1
{{ x.comment }}

Copyright 2019, cxsecurity.com

 

Back to Top