glibc getaddrinfo() stack overflow

2013.04.03
Risk: Low
Local: Yes
Remote: Yes
CWE: N/A


Ogólna skala CVSS: 5/10
Znaczenie: 2.9/10
Łatwość wykorzystania: 10/10
Wymagany dostęp: Zdalny
Złożoność ataku: Niska
Autoryzacja: Nie wymagana
Wpływ na poufność: Brak
Wpływ na integralność: Brak
Wpływ na dostępność: Częściowy

A customer reported a glibc crash, which turned out to be a stack overflow in getaddrinfo(). getaddrinfo() uses: struct sort_result results[nresults]; with nresults controlled by the nameservice chain (DNS or /etc/hosts). This will be visible mostly on threaded applications with smaller stacksizes, or operating near out of stack. Reproducer I tried: $ for i in `seq 1 10000000`; do echo "ff00::$i a1" >>/etc/hosts; done $ ulimit -s 1024 $ telnet a1 Segmentation fault (clean out /etc/hosts again ) I am not sure you can usually push this amount of addresses via DNS for all setups. Andreas is currently pushing the patch to glibc GIT. Reference: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=813121 Ciao, Marcus

Referencje:

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=813121
http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2013/q2/8


Vote for this issue:
50%
50%


 

Thanks for you vote!


 

Thanks for you comment!
Your message is in quarantine 48 hours.

Comment it here.


(*) - required fields.  
{{ x.nick }} | Date: {{ x.ux * 1000 | date:'yyyy-MM-dd' }} {{ x.ux * 1000 | date:'HH:mm' }} CET+1
{{ x.comment }}

Copyright 2024, cxsecurity.com

 

Back to Top