Podatność CVE-2016-2183

Podatność CVE-2016-2183

Publikacja: 2016-08-31 Modyfikacja: 2016-09-01

Opis:

The DES and Triple DES ciphers, as used in the TLS, SSH, and IPSec protocols and other protocols and products, have a birthday bound of approximately four billion blocks, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain cleartext data via a birthday attack against a long-duration encrypted session, as demonstrated by an HTTPS session using Triple DES in CBC mode, aka a "Sweet32" attack.

W naszej bazie, znaleźliśmy następujące noty dla tego CVE:

	Tytuł	Autor	Data
High	IBM Informix Dynamic Server DLL Injection / Code Execution	Informix	01.06.2017

Typ:

CWE-200

(Information Exposure)

CVSS2 => (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N)

Ogólna skala CVSS	Znaczenie	Łatwość wykorzystania
5/10	2.9/10	10/10

Wymagany dostęp	Złożoność ataku	Autoryzacja
Zdalny	Niska	Nie wymagana
Wpływ na poufność	Wpływ na integralność	Wpływ na dostępność
Częściowy	Brak	Brak

Affected software
Redhat -> Jboss enterprise application platform
Redhat -> Jboss enterprise web server
Redhat -> Jboss web server
Redhat -> Enterprise linux
Python -> Python
Oracle -> Database
Openssl -> Openssl
Cisco -> Content security management appliance

Referencje:

http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10759

http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-10/msg00013.html

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0336.html

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0337.html

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0338.html

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0462.html

http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=nas8N1021697

http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21991482

http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21995039

http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuapr2018-3678067.html

http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan2018-3236628.html

http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2017-3236622.html

http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2016-2881722.html

http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2017-3236626.html

http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinoct2016-3090545.html

http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/ovmbulletinoct2016-3090547.html

http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92630

http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/95568

http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1036696

http://www.splunk.com/view/SP-CAAAPSV

http://www.splunk.com/view/SP-CAAAPUE

https://access.redhat.com/articles/2548661

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1216

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2708

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2709

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2710

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3113

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3114

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3239

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3240

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2123

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1245

https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2016-2183

https://blog.cryptographyengineering.com/2016/08/24/attack-of-week-64-bit-ciphers-in-tls/

https://bto.bluecoat.com/security-advisory/sa133

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369383

https://github.com/ssllabs/ssllabs-scan/issues/387#issuecomment-242514633

https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docLocale=en_US&docId=emr_na-hpesbgn03765en_us

https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docLocale=en_US&docId=emr_na-hpesbux03725en_us

https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05302448

https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05309984

https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05323116

https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05349499

https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05356388

https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05369403

https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05369415

https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05385680

https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05390722

https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05390849

https://ics-cert.us-cert.gov/advisories/ICSMA-18-058-02

https://kb.pulsesecure.net/articles/Pulse_Security_Advisories/SA40312

https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10171

https://nakedsecurity.sophos.com/2016/08/25/anatomy-of-a-cryptographic-collision-the-sweet32-attack/

https://nodejs.org/en/blog/vulnerability/september-2016-security-releases/

https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201612-16

https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201701-65

https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201707-01

https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20160915-0001/

https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20170119-0001/

https://sweet32.info/

https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg04560.html

https://www.mitel.com/en-ca/support/security-advisories/mitel-product-security-advisory-17-0008

https://www.nccgroup.trust/us/about-us/newsroom-and-events/blog/2016/august/new-practical-attacks-on-64-bit-block-ciphers-3des-blowfish/

https://www.openssl.org/blog/blog/2016/08/24/sweet32/

https://www.sigsac.org/ccs/CCS2016/accepted-papers/

https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2016-16

https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2016-20

https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2016-21

https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2017-09

https://www.teskalabs.com/blog/teskalabs-bulletin-160826-seacat-sweet32-issue

Podatność CVE-2016-2183

W naszej bazie, znaleźliśmy następujące noty dla tego CVE:

High

IBM Informix Dynamic Server DLL Injection / Code Execution

CWE-200

CVSS2 => (AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N)

5/10

2.9/10

10/10

Zdalny

Niska

Nie wymagana

Częściowy

Brak

Brak

Affected software

Referencje: