Index
Bugtraq
Pełna lista
Błędy
Sztuczki
Exploity
Dorks list
Tylko z CVE
Tylko z CWE
Bogus
Ranking
CVEMAP
Świeża lista CVE
Producenci
Produkty
Słownik CWE
Sprawdź nr. CVE
Sprawdź nr. CWE
Szukaj
W Bugtraq
W bazie CVE
Po autorze
Po nr. CVE
Po nr. CWE
Po producencie
Po produkcie
RSS
Bugtraq
CVEMAP
CVE Produkty
Tylko Błędy
Tylko Exploity
Tylko Dorks
Więcej
cIFrex
Facebook
Twitter
Donate
O bazie
Lang
Polish
English
Submit
Podatności dla
'Watermelondb'
2020-06-03
CVE-2020-4035
CWE-89
In WatermelonDB (NPM package "@nozbe/watermelondb") before versions 0.15.1 and 0.16.2, a maliciously crafted record ID can exploit a SQL Injection vulnerability in iOS adapter implementation and cause the app to delete all or selected records from the database, generally causing the app to become unusable. This may happen in apps that don't validate IDs (valid IDs are `/^[a-zA-Z0-9_-.]+$/`) and use Watermelon Sync or low-level `database.adapter.destroyDeletedRecords` method. The integrity risk is low due to the fact that maliciously deleted records won't synchronize, so logout-login will restore all data, although some local changes may be lost if the malicious deletion causes the sync process to fail to proceed to push stage. No way to breach confidentiality with this vulnerability is known. Full exploitation of SQL Injection is mitigated, because it's not possible to nest an insert/update query inside a delete query in SQLite, and it's not possible to pass a semicolon-separated second query. There's also no known practicable way to breach confidentiality by selectively deleting records, because those records will not be synchronized. It's theoretically possible that selective record deletion could cause an app to behave insecurely if lack of a record is used to make security decisions by the app. This is patched in versions 0.15.1, 0.16.2, and 0.16.1-fix
Copyright
2024
, cxsecurity.com
Back to Top