Ipswitch WS_FTP 2007 Professional "wsftpurl" access violation vulnerability

2007.01.19

Credit: Michal Bucko

Risk: Low

Local: No

Remote: Yes

CVE: CVE-2007-0330

CWE: CWE-Other

CVSS Base Score: 7.5/10

Impact Subscore: 6.4/10

Exploitability Subscore: 10/10

Exploit range: Remote

Attack complexity: Low

Authentication: No required

Confidentiality impact: Partial

Integrity impact: Partial

Availability impact: Partial

> So it could be remotely
> exploitable after all.
>
> On the other hand, most people don't tell their browsers to open up a
> separate application to handle ftp:// links.

I agree. It could be exploited in the aforementioned way(but: WS_FTP is not 
registered to handle FTP protocol by default). Now I am thinking of 
something else. Could we use a specially crafted FHF file to exploit the 
vulnerability? I haven't checked that yet.

Michal Bucko (sapheal)

See this note in RAW Version

Vote for this issue:

50%

Thanks for you vote!

Thanks for you comment!
Your message is in quarantine 48 hours.

Comment it here.

Nick (*)

Email (*)

Video

Text (*)

(*) - required fields.

{{ x.nick }} | Date: {{ x.ux * 1000 | date:'yyyy-MM-dd' }} {{ x.ux * 1000 | date:'HH:mm' }} CET+1

{{ x.comment }}

Ipswitch WS_FTP 2007 Professional "wsftpurl" access violation vulnerability

Thanks for you vote!

Thanks for you comment!Your message is in quarantine 48 hours.

Thanks for you comment!
Your message is in quarantine 48 hours.